We explain what autonomy is, what moral autonomy and autonomy of will are. Also, its differences with heteronomy.
What is autonomy?
Autonomy is understood to the ability to decide independently, without coercion or the influence of third parties. This term is applied within philosophical (ethics), psychological (evolutionary psychology) and even legal and political (sovereignty) thinking, but always with similar meanings, linked to the capacity for self-management and independence, if not freedom.
In the cognitive and emotional development of people, autonomy becomes an increasingly marked and expected quality of the individual. Perhaps because as children (and even as adolescents) we are vulnerable beings, who largely depend on the decisions of their parents (which in legal matters enshrines the parental authority) both logistically and emotionally. This last form of dependency is the last to disappear, as we become more autonomous and begin to make our own decisions.
Adult individuals, thus, have a capacity for autonomy that makes them subjects of law, that is, people capable of making their own decisions without first consulting anyone (although they may choose to do so). In this sense it is the opposite of the heteronomy or dependency. Of course, with autonomy, as with freedom, also obligations and responsibilities are acquired. In that sense it is a trait of maturity or adulthood.
In political matters, similarly, it is a feature of sovereignty of nations as such: a country that has autonomy in legal, economic and cultural matters will be an independent country, therefore a freer country and more capable of facing the international community. .
See also: Moral values
Moral autonomy
Autonomy converges, from a philosophical point of view, both the individual's vision of others and of himself. Something linked to the psychoanalytic notion of the superego or superego: the set of rules to which the individual decides to adhere more or less consciously. This is particularly true in moral matters, in which the individual responds to a cultural tradition that he has received from his parents and his environment.
Moral autonomy, therefore, will be the ability to morally judge an action, situation, or eventthus determining whether it is something acceptable or not. Morality is susceptible to peer pressure, of course, but to the extent that individuals have well-formed criteria and are aware of their decision-making capacity, strong moral autonomy would be expected of them. Which does not mean, of course, that opinions cannot be changed.
Autonomy of the will
The autonomy of the will is a basic and primordial principle of contractual law and relationships between individuals: the express, manifest desire, without any presence of coercion or obligation, to decide for one's own person or one's own assets, and to subscribe to the desired contracts, or to negotiate their contents and effects.
Its foundation comes from the liberal legislations born from the French Revolution (1789), which They proposed freedom and equality among human beingsunder certain limits imposed by mutual consideration. These limitations are usually:
- The signed terms of a contract cannot be signed, under penalty of breaking or rendering the document void.
- No clause of the contract may contradict the legal system or jurisprudence of the rule of law.
Autonomy and heteronomy
Heteronomy is the opposite of autonomy: the need for the precepts and determinations of an individual, society or organization to come from another. Seen this way, it is a form of dependence, if not submissionsince another's criteria are those that are valid, in the absence (or instead of) of one's own.
These criteria, furthermore, are assumed without reflection, just as happens with the values that are instilled in us when we are children: they come from outside, from our parents, and only to the extent that we become autonomous can we choose to embrace them or replace them with a own code.
